[Majorityrights News] Trump will ‘arm Ukraine to the teeth’ if Putin won’t negotiate ceasefire Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 12 November 2024 16:20.
[Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43.
[Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19.
[Majorityrights News] Is the Ukrainian counter-offensive for Bakhmut the counter-offensive for Ukraine? Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 18 May 2023 18:55.
Taylor discusses the Youtube channel shut downs (including his own, Amren)...and BLM - unprecedented bald hatred of Whites, being supported by major corporations including H.P. Disney, Apple, IKEA, Goldman Sachs, Black Rock, Google ...
At the same time, member of the “American intelligentsia”, Paul Krugman, remarks:
Reality is coming for white supremacists driving golf carts
Florida is reporting an unprecedented number of Covid-19 cases, but Governor Ron DeSantis has pointed to the relatively low median age of the sick—36—to suggest that the outbreak isn’t having serious clinical consequences.
But now, record numbers of Floridians 75 and older are testing positive for Covid-19, according the latest report from Sunday, which reflects data through Saturday.
On 29 June, 2020, Andy Ngo provided congressional testimony at a hearing on “Government Violence Against Peaceful Civil Rights Protesters.” It was exactly one year after the antifa beating he was a victim of in Portland. The hearing was headed by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. Democrats dismissed antifa and blamed the recent violent riots on police and the far-right. Link to full unedited hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnBMw...
“If we really want a change in this world, we have to kill White people. We have to start killing them. Otherwise there will be no change, at all. They will continue to do what they do and they will be entitled about it and spoiled.
We have to kill them. I can’t stress that enough. Like, we need to start interbreeding with their women, fucking their women; having as many children as possible so that we can interbreed with their families; and get our race going. You know, they can’t be racist to a black person if they have a half black kid. You know what I mean? It’s a little more hard to be racists when you got children that are half black. You know?
And Mitch McConnell, we have to get him out of the fuckin’ Senate. He is the epitome of White people. Same with Trump. They lie, they use their hypocrisy and they’re terrible fuckin’ people. I mean, you just read, then look up any data or um, information and you can look it up for yourself; but people are too fuckin’ dumb to do that shit. Um.
I just, I’m, I’m really, at this point with White people like I just, we really need to fuckin’ get rid of them. You know? They don’t want to be here, they don’t want to be on our team, they don’t want to help, they don’t want to do anything with us, so lets fucking get them out of our fuckin country.
They’re not even fucking from here to fuckin begin with. They fucking from some other fucking place and then they come here and try to act like it’s theirs, like. This is why we need to kill them.
Like and if anybody’s serious about this shit, like I think I’m going to start a group on um, like on having talks about you know how they’re privileged and how they get away with everything…
You know, and when I say “White privilege”, I don’t mean like oh, you get something or you get money or something like that, like no.
You don’t have to deal with the shit that we got to deal with. Let me see if you’ve ever dealt with any of this. This is what I consider White privilege:
1) Have you ever been arrested for a crime that you didn’t commit?
2) Have you ever been accused of a crime that you didn’t commit.
3) Have you ever spent time in jail for a crime that you didn’t commit?”
In the Sortocracy of the DNA Nations, incarcerated people of color could be freed to go to colored societies; and they would not be subject to White jurisdiction to begin with unless they attempted to transgress our borders without our consent.
Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 25 June 2020 05:00.
Two White couples, two cities, in entirely different nations, Burnley, Lancashire England, and San Francisco, California, fired from their positions each, in four different companies, in effect for running afoul of “Black Lives Matter.”
WHITE COUPLE LOSE THEIR JOBS AFTER CALLING COPS ON NEIGHBOR FOR WRITING BLACK LIVES MATTER ON HIS PROPERTY
A white San Francisco couple, who called the police on their neighbor for writing “Black Lives Matter” in chalk at his own property, were both let go from their jobs after a social media post detailing the incident went viral, according to NewsOne.
Lisa Alexander, former CEO of LaFace Skincare (screenshot via Twitter)
A white San Francisco couple, who called the police on their neighbor for writing “Black Lives Matter” in chalk at his own property, were both let go from their jobs after a social media post detailing the incident went viral, according to NewsOne.
Lisa Alexander and her partner, Robert Larkins, originally accused James Juanillo, who is Filipino, of vandalizing the property and claimed that Juanillo didn’t live there. Juanillo says to Alexander “you don’t know if I live here or if this is my property,” to which Alexander responds, “We actually do know, that’s why we’re asking.
[...]
Due to the incident, Robert Larkins was fired by wealth management firm Raymond James on Monday as well. The company issues a statement regarding the firing on their Twitter account.
[...]
CBS News reported that Alexander apologized to her Filipino neighbor in a written statement. She was also fired from her position as the CEO of LaFace, a San Francisco-based skincare company.
JAKE HEPPLE CLAIMED RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE VILE BANNER...
BlackRock is a global financial giant with customers in 100 countries and its tentacles in major asset classes all over the world; and it now manages the spigots to trillions of bailout dollars from the Federal Reserve. The fate of a large portion of the country’s corporations has been put in the hands of a megalithic private entity with the private capitalist mandate to make as much money as possible for its owners and investors; and that is what it has proceeded to do.
To most people, if they are familiar with it at all, BlackRock is an asset manager that helps pension funds and retirees manage their savings through “passive” investments that track the stock market. But working behind the scenes, it is much more than that. BlackRock has been called “the most powerful institution in the financial system,” “the most powerful company in the world” and the “secret power.” It is the world’s largest asset manager and “shadow bank,” larger than the world’s largest bank (which is in China), with over $7 trillion in assets under direct management and another $20 trillion managed through its Aladdin risk-monitoring software. BlackRock has also been called “the fourth branch of government” and “almost a shadow government”, but no part of it actually belongs to the government. Despite its size and global power, BlackRock is not even regulated as a “Systemically Important Financial Institution” under the Dodd-Frank Act, thanks to pressure from its CEO Larry Fink, who has long had “cozy” relationships with government officials.
BlackRock’s strategic importance and political weight were evident when four BlackRock executives, led by former Swiss National Bank head Philipp Hildebrand, presented a proposal at the annual meeting of central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, in August 2019 for an economic reset that was actually put into effect in March 2020. Acknowledging that central bankers were running out of ammunition for controlling the money supply and the economy, the BlackRock group argued that it was time for the central bank to abandon its long-vaunted independence and join monetary policy (the usual province of the central bank) with fiscal policy (the usual province of the legislature). They proposed that the central bank maintain a “Standing Emergency Fiscal Facility” that would be activated when interest rate manipulation was no longer working to avoid deflation. The Facility would be deployed by an “independent expert” appointed by the central bank.
The COVID-19 crisis presented the perfect opportunity to execute this proposal in the US, with BlackRock itself appointed to administer it. In March 2020, it was awarded a no-bid contract under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) to deploy a $454 billion slush fund established by the Treasury in partnership with the Federal Reserve. This fund in turn could be leveraged to provide over $4 trillion in Federal Reserve credit. While the public was distracted with protests, riots and lockdowns, BlackRock suddenly emerged from the shadows to become the “fourth branch of government,” managing the controls to the central bank’s print-on-demand fiat money. How did that happen and what are the implications?
Rising from the Shadows
BlackRock was founded in 1988 in partnership with the Blackstone Group, a multinational private equity management firm that would become notorious after the 2008-09 banking crisis for snatching up foreclosed homes at firesale prices and renting them at inflated prices. BlackRock first grew its balance sheet in the 1990s and 2000s by promoting the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that brought down the economy in 2008. Knowing the MBS business from the inside, it was then put in charge of the Federal Reserve’s “Maiden Lane” facilities. Called “special purpose vehicles,” these were used to buy “toxic” assets (largely unmarketable MBS) from Bear Stearns and American Insurance Group (AIG), something the Fed was not legally allowed to do itself.
BlackRock really made its fortunes, however, in “exchange traded funds” (ETFs). It gained trillions in investable assets after it acquired the iShares series of ETFs in a takeover of Barclays Global Investors in 2009. By 2020, the wildly successful iShares series included over 800 funds and $1.9 trillion in assets under management.
This is very serious—if you do not take action, you may no longer be able to read VDARE.com very soon.
This Monday, June15th, Network Solutions, our domain name registrar, suddenly gave us 10 days’ notice of its intention to terminate our account, after some 20 years. It gave no specific reasons beyond alleged violations of its Acceptable Use Policy, but said “we consider your continued use of our services a serious issue and risk to our business and corporate reputation.”
What does this mean and what can you do?
A domain name registrar handles the reservation of web addresses. Without registration, VDARE.com would be inaccessible on normal web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge.
Thanks to our patriotic donors (join them here!), VDARE.com has pursued its mission of America First non-profit journalism unchangingly since we opened on Christmas Eve, 1999.
So why are we being kicked off Network Solutions now? Because the political environment has changed. The Left’s Reign of Terror is intensifying. It is desperate to keep the immigration issue out of public debate until it succeeds in Electing A New People.
Network Solutions is only the most recent example corporate complicity in the suppression of Free Speech across America. But it’s perhaps the most shocking. To my knowledge, withdrawal of registrar services has never happened to a site as mainstream as VDARE.com.
Of course, we’re fighting back. We will never kneel. Our lawyer has challenged Network Solutions. And my team and I are actively searching for an alternative registrar solution. We hope we will find one. But we know it is likely only a matter of time before the new company caves under Antifa pressure, too.
In other words, it’s not impossible now that VDARE.com will indeed ultimately lose registrar services altogether. If that happens, you will NOT be able to access VDARE at the normal “VDARE.com” address!
Introducing the TOR browser: We hope we can find a way to avoid that. But we do urge you to prepare for this terrible day NOW.
If we fail to find a new domain registrar, the ONLY way you will be able to continue reading VDARE.com is via the “Dark Web”—using the TOR browser. But the connotations drawn from the moniker “Dark Web” are misleading.
TOR is an internet browser focused entirely on user privacy and security, protecting users from having their internet history analyzed for information based on interests and behavior. TOR is also the browser used to access websites that are not indexed by web search engines, not served by domain registrars or that are vulnerable to harm by autocratic governments and other bad actors. We suggest TOR to readers as a prudent workaround in this threatening time.
The most important thing for you to do right now is to save this address:
3. Enter the TOR address in the TOR browser and save it as a bookmark!
Make Sure You Get Our Emails!
1. If you have not already done so, sign up for our e-bulletin. If you are a member of our e-bulletin community, you will always know by email where and how to find us
2. Subscribe to our VDARE Quarterly print magazine. In a worst case scenario, patriots are still allowed to use the mail.
PLEASE Donate to VDARE.com!
1. We are determined that these attacks will not take VDARE.com down. But it takes resources for us to defend ourselves—and America. We are funded entirely by donations from readers like you. All donations are tax-deductible. For more information, visit http://www.vdare.com/donate.
The situation is grave—but not hopeless. Please educate yourself how to use the censorship-resistant technology of TOR. If you need technical assistance, please DO write or call us, we will help you. We will post this explanation permanently on our site, and add a TOR icon to our menu bar.
The link between you, VDARE.com reader, and ourselves must not be cut by our enemies.
For the American Nation—for freedom!
Yours sincerely,
Lydia Brimelow and the VDARE.com Team .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
860-361-6231
Some Recent Material on VDARE.com:
FBI Data: Blacks, Who Are Only 13.4% of the Population, Were 54.9% of Known Murder Offenders in 2018
by Steve Sailer, 18 June 2020: How Much More Homicidal Are Blacks Than Whites? 7.4x More Like the Obama Administration Said, or 11.7x More?
What with race and law enforcement being much in the news this month, you might think we’d see more reference to the most authoritative official statistics on the subject. Here are the latest FBI statistics on murder offenders by race:
At this point, 29.5% of 2018 murderers are of unknown race, whether because the case hasn’t been cleared yet or because the local agency didn’t get around to reporting the race to the federal government.
Of the 11,514 murder offenders in 2018 where the race of the offender is known by now, 6,318 of the offenders were black: 54.9%.
Blacks make up 13.4% of the population at present.
So, blacks in 2018 were 7.9 times more likely per capita to be murder offenders than the rest of the population.
In recent generations, this black to all else homicide offender ratio goes up and down somewhat, depending upon what drugs are hot, the political climate, and so forth, but usually winds up a little under 8X. For example, in 2011 the Obama Administration’s Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that blacks made up 52.5% of homicide offenders over the 29 years from 1980 to 2008:
These stats would seem rather relevant to current discussions, but for some reason, the just never see to come up…
Jean Raspail Dies At 94: Lived Long Enough To Say “I Told You So”
At the moment, when search Google News for “Raspail”, you get French death notices, and New York Times story, illustrated with a picture of presidential aide Stephen Miller, titled A Racist Book’s Malign and Lingering Influence, by Elian Peltier and Nicholas Kulish, NYT, November 22, 2019.
Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 18 June 2020 05:29.
Is James Woods a reformed dickhead? Probably not.
Probably just trying to save face; that is, now that the savagery of his liberalism has been exposed with home made videos overflowing the media wall against showing the reality and extent of black hyper-assertiveness and violence.
I hate calling attention to James Woods Twitter, because the dude is an utter hypocrite and asshole. He’s taken to posting acts of black violence of late, but when asked how he played the role of Byron De La Beckwith Jr. (convicted killer of Medgar Evars), Woods said that he had to ignore the usual advice for actors when playing a villainous character, viz., by finding something redeeming in the character to identify with. Woods claimed that he could find NOTHING good about De La Beckwith and could only imitate him.
Notice Woods sarcastic remark about the video of the pummeling; “Call a social worker” ...as if we should all rely on our immediate instincts and not work to create social circumstances where an assault like this is unlikely? ...like James Woods was wise and caring about this all the while, ahead of the social curve.
Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 17 June 2020 05:37.
I hate to present a note of sarcasm, but the stultification of our people’s understanding as a result of red caping of important philosophical concepts for social organization has been unbelievably thorough.
Social Construction of the DNA Nations: A major problem, obstruction really, that I have had in getting better ideas understood and underway has been the misrepresentation of these better ideas for social organization of European peoples; so much so have ideas of social organization been misrepresented that European peoples have been repulsed by the very ideas that they need most to facilitate their social organization and homeostasis.
Social Constructionism is prominent among the misrepresented ideas made didactically repulsive. Social Constructionism properly understood doesn’t maintain that you can merely make whatever you like of your existence – you can try, but if your ideas are absurd they are going to be thwarted in one way or another (in a word, how is being solipsistic – deciding that you can be whatever you like completely irrespective of what other people think, let alone the laws of biology and physics - how is that “social”? - it isn’t. It’s Cartesian).
Social Constructionism is a correction to Cartesian estrangement, in either of its two extreme directions, either beyond nature or within nature, but on either side, veering toward no account, “that’s just the-way-it-isness”, which is susceptible to leave our people unprotected for the lack of accountability to their relative group systemic interests.
The group system, which Aristotle called praxis, is the middle range between the Cartesian extremes, the social world, provided structure by the concept of unionization – as opposed to Cartesian runway beyond nature or on course of brute nature, unionization structures human, social systemic accountability, thereby correctivity, which corresponds to group homeostasis, which is what we want, our autonomy, our sovereignty, our agency. Our social group, praxis, which should be the default calibration, while truth quests the feedback. Through accountability as such, we may establish coherence, the first task of any individual or specific group in the world, and with accountability as such, we may establish agency and warranted assertability:
The idea of social constructionism rather is to sensitize and centralize our people as the most relevant perspective – viz., our relations and their necessity; and with that accountability and coherence we can call attention to the agency that we have in the construction of our world; always a fact in one of three ways:
More literally, as in the construction of a building.
More metaphorically, as in the “construction” of a child.
Post hoc in relation to brute facts, as in we retain that capacity to negotiate to some extent how those facts come to count.
Why am I bringing this up now?
Social constructionism properly understood is an innocuous idea at worst and at its best, it is honest in the way the world and knowledge construction actually works; facilitating the ongoing social construction and correction of knowledge – knowledge imperative to our survival as a people.
Because our people react to misrepresentations of the idea, they are not taking advantage of this idea which the internet facilitates so well.
The Internet is here! We can interact in the construction of the DNA Nations concept! And yet for these past ten years, people have been acting like they are still sitting in front of the television, movie screen or radio, or going to the media of yesteryear as Bowery notes, of the bible, and that I am in front of the congregation: I have been treated as if I am either Moses on Mount Sinai, who is supposed to deliver the commandments by magic transmission to their brains, or, as they seem to prefer, that I am an impostor that they must debunk, with vicious ad hominum for their gods, be they Moses indeed, Jesus or Hitler or some other icon.
They’ll do anything, it seems, but join me in interaction, the way that social construcionism is supposed to work, in ongoing development and correction of ideas.
You think you are so smart? Fine, lets see how you can help refine and advance these ideas. Think I am mistaken about something? Let me know where I can make a correction..etc.
I have been maintaining all along that I know that I have set out solid, important specificatory structures, now lets shape and craft them in our interests!
So the task now is to wait for/and or find those people who will help me to build the DNA Nations concept - they might care to help develop other ideas that I’ve advanced as well, but - the DNA Nations concept is most important to develop at this point – for obvious reasons now, it is urgent that we get this underway.
